02/28/2010 (3:12 am)

Pleasant Hill Commons sells for $12.4M

Filed under: management |

A new Illinois non-traded real investment estate trust (REIT) bought the Pleasant Hill Commons shopping center in Kissimmee for $12.4 million in cash.

Inland Diversified Kissimmee LLC, a related entity to Oakbrook, Ill.-based Inland Diversified Real Estate Trust Inc., bought the 70,642-square-foot Publix-anchored shopping center from Winter Park-based MCP Retail LLC on Feb. 18, said a filing with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission. MCP Retail LLC is an entity related to developer Michael Collard Properties Inc.

Lou Quilici of Inland Real Estate Acquisitions Inc. handled the transaction, said a news release.

The property is 100 percent leased, the SEC filing said, and has tenants including Tijuana Flats, Subway, Jackson Hewitt, Metro PCS, Pizza Hut, BonWorth and Fantastic Sams.

Inland Diversified Real Estate Trust filed its prospectus in August 2009 to be taxed as a REIT beginning with the tax year ended Dec flexcheck cash advance. 31. This was the firm’s second purchase and was funded by proceeds from its initial public offering, the SEC filing said. The REIT focuses on the acquisition and development of a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate assets.

The REIT is related to The Inland Real Estate Group of Companies Inc., a fast-growing buyer of retail property in the United States and one of the largest shopping center owners in North America. Inland-sponsored firms own and manage more than 113 million square feet of commercial real estate in 46 states and manage properties valued at more than $25.3 billion.

Source

Instant online cash advance with next-day cash direct deposit.

01/19/2010 (10:15 pm)

Surprise: Recessions don’t spark business startups

Filed under: management |

Think recessions spur laid-off workers to launch new ventures? Think again.

A study released this week by the Kauffmann Foundation found that the number of new businesses incorporated annually in the U.S. has remained remarkably consistent over the years.

"We have a surprisingly steady supply of new firms, despite frequent and sometimes sharp changes in economic conditions," the study’s authors concluded. "No matter which data set one examines, any given year’s total of new companies is consistent with other years, with annual numbers fluctuating only mildly."

Researchers Dane Stangler and Paul Kedrosky crunched data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the Small Business Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, covering 1977 through March 2009. About 600,000 new businesses were formed each year during that 30-year period. The data includes formally established new enterprises as well as new franchise locations and other outposts of existing companies.

For more than a year, the potential for startup growth has been promoted as the silver lining of the recession.

The conventional wisdom goes that as people lose their jobs, they are inspired to launch that innovative little company that’s been percolating in the back of their minds for years.

Recessions also lower the cost of entry for new companies and make customers more willing to explore less-expensive alternatives to current products or services they’re using, said Rhonda Abrams, founder of entrepreneurial consulting firm The Planning Shop.

"I liken a recession to a forest fire — it can be devastating, but can clear out weak and old growth," Abrams said. "Small upstart companies have a chance to get a hold better when their competitors are weakened."

But Kaufmann researcher Stangler said there just isn’t data to back up that kind of ‘hopeful thinking."

"It’s not that the reasons behind that thinking are bad, it’s just that from the evidence, we don’t expect there to be a huge increase in the amount of startups or a decrease during this recession," he said. The Kaufmann Foundation, based in Kansas City, Mo., is a nonprofit organization focused on entrepreneurship research and advancement.

To check their findings from the last three decades, Stangler and Kedrosky went back even further, to census reports from the 1940s and 1950s. There, they found remarkably similar results. Only one year — 1946 — had a noticeable startup spike, a result the researchers attribute to the effects of the end of World War II and a flood of returning war veterans.

What’s behind the consistency in startup launches? Stangler said two findings stood out: Even in down times, the U.S. has a fairly stable and consistent economy. Also, the number of working-age adults in the workforce fluctuates little.

But just because there’s no data to prove that economic turmoil spurs business growth doesn’t mean recession-era entrepreneurs should be disheartened, Abrams said. Citing her own research, she notes that the majority of current Fortune 500 companies were started during tough economic times.

The Kauffman Foundation has similar findings: More than half of 2009’s Fortune 500 companies launched in bear markets, it reported in June.

"Even if the numbers of new companies are consistent, you have a better chance at being a big success if you form during a recession or a depression than in good times," Abrams said.

She also believes that when the dust has cleared, this recession will have spurred more new businesses than past downturns because the percentage of those who are unemployed will remain persistently high.

"More people will turn to consulting and other kinds of low-cost-of-entry businesses to tide them over," Abrams said. 

Source

12/24/2009 (7:33 pm)

Italian Consumer Optimism Jumps to Seven-Year High on Recovery

Filed under: management |

Consumer confidence in Italy unexpectedly rose in December to the highest in more than seven years as Italians grew more optimistic about purchasing durable goods after Europe’s fourth-biggest economy emerged from a recession.

The Isae Institute’s consumer confidence index rose to 113.7, the highest since July 2002, from 112.8 in November, the Rome-based research center said today in an e-mailed statement. Economists had forecast a drop to 112.7, the median of 12 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey showed.

Italy’s economy snapped five quarters of contraction and expanded 0.6 percent in the third quarter and the recovery is gaining momentum as consumer spending and exports pick up. Confindustria, Italy’s employers lobby, this month raised its forecast for 2010 growth to 1.1 percent from 0.8 percent, saying the recovery “will not derail.”

The gain in Italian optimism contrasted with growing pessimism in Germany. Consumer confidence in Europe’s biggest economy fell for a third month as households became more concerned about job security and rising energy prices, a separate report said yesterday. Consumer confidence in France fell in December for the first time in nine months and spending by French consumers declined in November, a separate report said today.

Italians were more optimistic about their personal situation and their ability to buy durable goods such as cars and appliances, today’s report said.

Source

12/07/2009 (11:36 pm)

U.S. Treasury Says TARP to Cost $200 Billion Less

Filed under: management |

The Obama administration expects the cost of the Troubled Asset Relief Program to be $200 billion less than projected, helping to reduce the size of the budget deficit, a Treasury Department official said yesterday.

The administration forecast in August that the TARP would ultimately cost $341 billion, once banks had repaid the government for capital injections and other investments. Congress authorized $700 billion for the program in October 2008.

Banks have paid back $71 billion so far, and a planned repayment by Bank of America Corp. would bring that figure to $116 billion. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said in an interview last week that he expects the TARP to get as much as $175 billion in repayments from banks by the end of 2010.

“The fact that they are spending less TARP money means that recovery is better and stronger than expected, and that’s all positive for growth,” said Mitul Kotecha, Hong Kong-based head of global foreign-exchange strategy at Calyon, the investment banking unit of France’s Credit Agricole SA. “It shows that things are progressing in the right direction.”

The financial bailout program, begun under President George W. Bush, has drawn fire from critics in Congress who say the government has done more to help Wall Street banks than average Americans. Last month Republican Representative Kevin Brady of Texas told Geithner he should resign during a hearing of the Congress’ Joint Economic Committee.

Create Jobs

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, said last week that legislation is being written to use some TARP funds to help local communities and small businesses.

Pelosi said TARP funds would be “appropriately used” to pay for new jobs promotion programs because “the more jobs we create the more money comes back into the public till” as tax revenue that will “reduce the deficit.”

House Republican Leader John Boehner said Geithner should shut down the financial bailout program and use money left in the fund to reduce government debt.

The U.S. budget deficit reached a record $1.42 trillion in the 2009 fiscal year that ended Sept. 30 as the government spent money on stimulus programs to pull the nation out of the worst recession since the 1930s and tax revenue declined.

“The deficit is definitely a concern that’s overhanging the dollar, there’s no doubt,” said Calyon’s Kotecha. “But there is a long way to go before the deficit improves to a point where concerns completely recede. On the margin, it’s good news for the dollar but I don’t think we will see a huge impact off this news.”

Turning a Profit

The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note was little changed at 3.47 percent as of 7:50 a.m. in London, according to BGCantor Market Data.

The trade-weighted Dollar Index fell 0.4 percent to 75.604 as of 7:55 a.m. in London from 75.911 in New York late last week. The index tracks the U.S. currency against the euro, yen, U.K. pound, Canadian dollar, Swiss franc and Swedish krona.

The Treasury invested about $245 billion last fiscal year into U.S. banks to shore up the financial system. In the long run, those investments are expected to turn a profit of $19 billion, compared with a previous estimate of a $76 billion cost, the Treasury official said yesterday.

The government’s net cost for its investments in banks, auto companies and insurers came to $42 billion last fiscal year, the official said, about $110 billion less than projected in August.

‘Not Good Enough’

The Treasury official said the TARP should be judged on the basis of its effects on the financial system, and not its cost.

The U.S. economy expanded for the first time in a year in the third quarter, growing at a 2.8 percent annual rate. The Standard and Poor’s 500 Financials Index has jumped 140 percent since March 6, and the cost of three-month dollar loans in London between banks fell to 0.257 percent on Dec. 4 from 1.41 percent at the beginning of the year.

Employers cut 7.2 million jobs since the recession began in December 2007. Payrolls fell by 11,000 workers in November, the smallest decline in 23 months, figures from the Labor Department showed last week. The jobless rate declined to 10 percent, from a 26-year high of 10.2 percent in October.

Geithner, in last week’s interview, said the decline in job losses was “progress, but not good enough.”

As banks repay their TARP funds, the Treasury is disposing of the stakes it acquired through the program. To exit TARP, and the additional oversight it brings, banks must buy back the government’s preferred shares and also agree on how to dispose of warrants the Treasury received as part of the deals.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. redeemed its warrants for $1.1 billion, while JPMorgan Chase & Co., Capital One Financial Corp. and TCF Financial Corp. have opted to let the Treasury auction their warrants. That process is now under way.

Source

11/27/2009 (12:30 am)

Fannie Mae to tighten lending standards: report

Filed under: management |

Fannie Mae plans to raise minimum credit score requirements next month and limit the amount of overall debt that borrowers can carry relative to their incomes, The Washington Post reported on Thursday.

Starting December 12, the automated system that the government-controlled mortgage finance company uses to approve loans will reject borrowers who have at least a 20 percent down payment but whose credit scores fall below 620 out of 850, the newspaper reported. Previously, the cut-off was 580.

Also, for borrowers with a 20 percent down payment, no more than 45 percent of their gross monthly income can go toward paying debts, the newspaper said.

A Fannie Mae spokesman told the newspaper that the limits reflect the company’s recent experience.

Loans to people with credit scores below 620 fell seriously behind at a rate approximately nine times higher than other loans purchased in the same period, Fannie Mae spokesman Brian Faith said. Loans taken out by borrowers with lots of debt also suffer higher levels of serious delinquency, he said.

“It’s not enough to help borrowers buy a home — we must also ensure that they can stay in the home over the long term,” Faith said in a statement to The Washington Post.

Read more

09/17/2009 (4:03 pm)

The planes, trains and automobiles rally

Filed under: management |

If you’re looking for confirmation that this stock market rally might actually be for real, look no further than the stodgy world of transportation.

The Dow Jones Transportation average hit a new high for the year in mid-August and has continued to climb since then, closing above the 4,000 level on Monday for the first time since November.

And some investing experts think this is an extremely encouraging sign for the economy at large.

Now you might wonder how relevant the transportation sector is these days. Railroad stocks? This is the age of Google, Facebook and Twitter, not the era of robber barons.

Of course, that’s true. But the transportation sector is still a vital part of the economy because it is a key gauge of consumer spending.

Without trains, boats, trucks and planes to ship all those netbooks and iPhones to warehouses and retailers, there would be no mobile gadgets available to buy and you wouldn’t be able to tweet and update your status on the go.

"If transportation stocks are getting tanked, that means people believe that nothing is getting shipped. The move higher may mean that the economy is bottoming — even though we’re not out of the woods yet," said Frank Ingarra, Jr., co-portfolio manager with Hennessy Funds, a money management firm with about $850 million in assets.

So the spike in the Dow Jones Transportation average, or the transports for short, is worth exploring. The transports consist of 20 key companies within the sector, including leading railroads Union Pacific (UNP, Fortune 500) and CSX (CSX, Fortune 500), airlines JetBlue (JBLU) and Southwest (LUV, Fortune 500), and several truckers and maritime shippers.

And according to a trading rule known as the Dow Theory, it’s often considered a bullish sign when the transports and their far more well-known counterpart, the Dow Jones industrial average, both are doing well.

Usually, investors look for one average to "confirm" the other, which means that if one of the two hits a new high for a certain period of time, the other average should also soon hit a new high if the rally has legs.

With the transports now comfortably above the January level of around 3,737, investors got the confirmation they were hoping for: The Dow 30 hit a new high back in late July and hasn’t looked back since.

One big reason that the transports have surged — the average is up more than 85% from the March lows — is that airline stocks are no longer being priced as if every carrier is on a one-way flight to Chapter 11.

The major airlines traded at extremely distressed levels earlier this year but have roared back on hopes that oil prices are stabilizing and that travel will pick up as the economy recovers absolutely free credit report.

But airlines aren’t the only group in the transport sector to improve on expectations of better times ahead. Last Friday, one of the largest components of the transports, shipper FedEx (FDX, Fortune 500), surprised Wall Street by saying that profits for the next two quarters would be better than expected.

That news helped push shares of FedEx more than 6% higher on Friday and lifted the stock of UPS (UPS, Fortune 500), its top rival and fellow Dow Jones Transportation component, by nearly 4.5%.

The upbeat outlook from FedEx could be a good omen for the broader economy since it may mean that consumers and businesses are becoming more willing to loosen up their purse strings.

John Kosar, director of research with Asbury Research in Chicago, said there are signs that this may be happening in other areas of the financial markets as well.

"A lot of people look at copper as an economic barometer since rising prices could mean that more goods are being made. The performance of the transports is letting you know if goods are being shipped. So that’s why they have significance and meeting," he said.

The better-than-expected retail sales for August also appears to confirm that there is a nascent consumer recovery.

Jason Seidl, an analyst with Dahlman & Rose, a boutique investment firm based in New York that covers the transportation, energy and agricultural industries, said he’s cautiously optimistic that business is turning around for railroads and truckers.

He said there has been a pickup in auto shipments thanks to the government’s Cash for Clunkers program and added that demand to ship chemicals and steel is increasing as well. But, he cautioned, sales and profits for transportation companies are still likely to be lower than a year ago over the next quarter or two.

"We’ve seen an uptick off the bottom but we’re not ready to declare victory yet. On an absolute basis, the numbers still don’t look great," he said.

So will this transportation rally continue? FedEx will release its full results on September 17, so it will be interesting to hear if executives are witnessing a real increase in demand or if its new profit guidance is being driven more by lower expenses.

If FedEx executives don’t sound too excited about their sales outlook, that could be a cause for concern.

Talkback: Is the recent increase in consumer spending a sign the recession may be over? Are you starting to spend more again? Share your comments below. 

Source

09/10/2009 (9:36 am)

Doctors slash vaccines due to rising costs

Filed under: management |

Parents who bring their kids to Dr. G. Andrew McIntosh for the chicken pox vaccine are out of luck.

The family physician, who has a solo practice in Uniontown, Ohio, doesn’t offer that shot because he can’t afford it. Most insurers won’t sufficiently cover the cost.

"It doesn’t do me any good. I am losing money on [them]," he said. The chicken pox vaccine runs about $115, but insurers only cover between $68 to $83 of that.

McIntosh has also cut back on a handful of other critical childhood vaccines for the same reason — including the measles, mumps and rubella, known as the MMR vaccine.

It costs him about $58 to buy an MMR shot, he said, while insurers pay about about $40.

So McIntosh keeps a lot less of the MMR on hand. If a patient needs the shot and he doesn’t have it, he sends them to a nearby public health clinic.

"I’m not happy to do that," he said. "The clinic is far, the service isn’t great and my patients aren’t happy to go there."

Although he says he "feels compelled" to take care of people, he adds, "I can’t save the world and pay for my staff," he said. "As we say, ‘no margin, no mission.’"

"I’ve lost a fair number of kids [at the practice] because I’ve had to send them elsewhere for their shots," he said.

Alarming numbers

It’s not clear exactly how widespread vaccine cutbacks are, but in a recent industry survey, 5% of pediatricians and 11% of physicians indicated that they’re seriously considering no longer offering immunizations. Currently there are about 350,000 pediatricians and family physicians in the U.S.

"These are fantastically alarming numbers," said Dr. Richard Lander, a Livingston N.J.-based pediatrician who chairs a committee on administration and practices at the American Academy of Pediatricians. (AAP)

"It’s an example of how health care is being driven by managed care in the United States," Lander said.

Doctors have to absorb any costs that insurance doesn’t cover because in most states insurance contracts prohibit providers from charging patients the difference.

Dr. Jim King, a family physician in Selmer, Tenn. is another medical professional who is dropping expensive vaccines because of "insufficient" reimbursement from insurers.

"The vaccine for shingles is fairly expensive, about $75 to $150 per vaccine," said King, who is also board chair of the American Academy of Family Physicians.

"The profit margin on it is very small, so we’re not giving that. If we lose money on one, we need to administer nine to break even," he said. Like McIntosh, doctors at King’s practice are referring patients to public clinics for shots that they no longer administer.

The economics work a little better in the case of influenza vaccines, which can cost between $7 to about $33 per vaccine, according to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. So King is stocking up on the flu vaccine.

The threat to public health

Public health experts are particularly worried about doctors dropping vaccinations.

Dr. Lance Rodewald, head of the Immunization Services Division at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, points to the consequences this trend has had on public health in the past.

"Between 1989 to 1991, a number of doctors stopped providing vaccinations to children because of financing issues," he said free credit reports.

Instead, doctors referred patients to public health clinics for shots like the MMR. But many parents failed to follow up on those shots, Rodewald said, and their toddlers were never immunized.

The result: The situation led to 55,000 cases of measles, 11,000 hospitalizations and 123 toddler deaths.

The CDC found that more than half of the children who had contracted the measles had not been vaccinated, even though many of them had seen a health care provider.

"This is why we are taking attitudes of doctors very seriously when they say they are delaying buying vaccines pending insurance coverage, or that they could stop vaccinating because of declining revenues," Rodewald said.

The CDC maintains that vaccination rates for most child and adolescent vaccines are currently about 80% in the United States.

Hidden costs

Vaccines of all kinds represent the largest operating expense for some doctors, according to the AAP.

The problem: Most insurers pay providers just the base cost of the vaccine. So if it costs $120 to buy a particular vaccine, insurance would pay back $120. But Lander points out that there are a lot more expenses that go into providing a vaccine, including the refrigeration, electricity and insurance required to store the shots. On average, doctors keep $100,000 to $150,000 worth of vaccines on hand each year.

The AAP estimates that the actual cost to providers to acquire vaccines could be 17% to 28% above the price of the vaccine itself.

"This is America. Running a private practice is a business," said Lander. "It’s not $120 but closer to $140 for me to break even," said Lander.

The insurance industry acknowledged that "there is always a natural tension between health plans and providers about payment," said Susan Pisano, spokeswoman for America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP).

Then there’s the cost to doctors of the office visit to administer a shot. Lander maintains that a majority of insurers are inadequately paying doctors for this service, too.

"When a patient comes to my practice for shots, a nurse will explain what shots will be given, hand out pamphlets and complete paperwork," he said.

Reimbursements for administration fees range anywhere between 60% to 100% of the cost depending on a doctor’s contract with the insurer.

"Managed care had decreased [overall] access to health care because of poor pay to providers," Lander said.

McIntosh agreed. "I enjoy seeing kids. It’s joyful to see a baby and watch them grow up healthy," McIntosh said. "But I am giving that up because I can’t give them the shots they need."

He said more of his patients now are the elderly. "It makes me sad how the dynamics of my practice have changed," he said.

Talkback: Have you or a doctor that you know left the medical profession mid-career to start a new career outside of the health care industry? E-mail your story to realstories@cnnmoney.com and you could be part of an upcoming article. For the CNNMoney.com Comment Policy, click here.  

Source

09/05/2009 (3:12 am)

U.S. says European subsidies have harmed Boeing

Filed under: management |

The United States confirmed on Friday it has received a confidential World Trade Organization ruling in its multibillion-dollar complaint against European government support for Airbus.

“We are still reviewing the interim report, which is over 1,000 pages long. Because the interim report is confidential, we cannot discuss the contents,” said Debbie Mesloh, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Trade Representative’s office.

“The United States has always maintained that the European governments have provided unfair subsidies to Airbus that harm U.S. interest,” Mesloh added, alluding to Airbus’ U.S. rival Boeing, which pressed USTR to bring the case.

“In this dispute, the United States is challenging dozens of measures providing over billions of dollars in subsidies to Airbus, including launch aid to every major Airbus aircraft model,” she added free business cards.

Since the United States brought the case in 2004, the governments of France, Germany, Spain and Britain have continued to provide contested “launch aid loans” for Airbus.

The European aircraft manufacturer’s latest project is the A350 wide-body jet. Boeing officials have said they hoped Friday’s confidential decision would halt some $4 billion in European launch aid loans for that aircraft.

“The dispute has proven to be one of the most complex and lengthy disputes under the WTO,” Mesloh said.

(Reporting by Doug Palmer; editing by Paul Simao)

Read more

07/07/2009 (3:39 pm)

Jobs report slams stocks

Filed under: management |

Stocks tumbled Thursday, with the Dow losing 212 points, after a worse-than-expected jobs report hammered hopes that the economy is close to stabilizing.

The Dow Jones industrial average (INDU) fell 212 points, or 2.5%. The S&P 500 (SPX) index lost 27 points, or 2.9% and the Nasdaq (COMP) fell 49 points, or 2.7%.

The New York Stock Exchange extended trading until 4:15 p.m. ET, so as to allow customers to put through orders that were impacted by system irregularities. The NYSE did not specify what the irregularities were.

Stocks tumbled at the open and remained in the red throughout the session as investors considered the broader implications of the dismal June jobs report.

"The report was kind of a rude awakening and unfortunately I think there’s more to come," said Joseph Saluzzi, co-head of equity trading at Themis Trading.

"People are realizing that the stock market rally doesn’t mean the economy is coming back."

Since bottoming at a 12-year low, the S&P 500 had surged over 40% through June 11. But in the weeks since then, it has lost 5% of that.

Jobs report: Employers cut 467,000 jobs from their payrolls in June, after cutting 322,000 jobs in May, the Labor Department reported Thursday. That made June the first month in four in which job losses rose from the previous month. Economists surveyed by Briefing.com expected 365,000 job losses.

The unemployment rate, generated by a separate survey, rose to 9.5% from 9.4%, short of forecasts for an increase to 9.6%.

"The report was terrible," said Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at Maria Fiorini Ramirez Inc."It’s telling us that there is a lot more pain than people realize that we are going to have to get through before there can be a recovery."

On the move: Declines were broad based, with all 30 Dow stocks falling, led by oil components Chevron (CVX, Fortune 500) and Exxon Mobil (XOM, Fortune 500). IBM (IBM, Fortune 500), Boeing (BA, Fortune 500), Caterpillar (CAT, Fortune 500), Procter & Gamble (PG, Fortune 500), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ, Fortune 500), United Technologies (UTX, Fortune 500) and Wal-Mart (WMT, Fortune 500) were the other big losers.

Economically sensitive trucking and railroad stocks plunged, dragging down the Dow Jones Transportation (DJT) average by 3.7%.

Financial shares tumbled, including Dow components American Express (AXP, Fortune 500), JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) and Travelers Companies (TRV, Fortune 500).

Market breadth was negative and volume was light with Wall Street pros checking out early for the holiday. On the New York Stock Exchange, losers topped winners by over four to one on volume of 733 million shares fast cash advance. On the Nasdaq, decliners beat advancers five to one on volume of 1.95 billion shares.

All financial markets are closed Friday for the Independence Day holiday.

Weak start to new quarter: Stocks climbed Wednesday on the first day of the third quarter as investors found some encouragement in the day’s housing and manufacturing reports. But the advance lost steam Thursday, with the jobs report giving investors a reason to retreat after a strong second quarter.

In the April-through-June period, the S&P 500 gained 15.2%, its best quarter in more than a decade. The Dow rose 11% and the Nasdaq 20%. Both indexes posted their best quarters since the second of 2003. Stocks rallied on hopes that the economy was starting to stabilize after the six months of panic that followed the collapse of Lehman Brothers last September.

But lately, stocks have churned on concerns that the market got ahead of itself.

Economic news: Normally a market mover, the weekly jobless claims report was overshadowed by the June payrolls report.

The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment fell to 614,000 last week from a revised 630,000 the previous week, the Labor Department reported. Economists thought claims would fall to 615,000.

May factory orders rose 1.2%, the Commerce Department reported, versus forecasts for a rise of 0.9%. Factory orders rose a revised 0.5% in April.

Company news: In deal news, Exelon (EXC, Fortune 500) has sweetened its hostile takeover offer for rival power generator NRG Energy (NRG, Fortune 500). The all-stock offer is $8 billion versus the previous offer of $7 billion.

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ, Fortune 500) will take an 18% equity stake in biotech Elan (ELN) in exchange for a $1 billion investment. J&J will also buy Elan’s share of its Alzheimer’s disease treatment program with Wyeth.

U.S.-traded shares of Elan gained 11% in active New York Stock Exchange trading.

Commodities: Energy prices tumbled, with U.S. light crude oil for August delivery falling $2.37 to $66.94 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

COMEX gold for August delivery fell $10.60 to settle at $930.70 an ounce.

Bonds: Treasury prices rallied, lowering the benchmark 10-year note yield to 3.5% from 3.53%. Treasury prices and yields move in opposite directions.

Other markets: In global trade, Asian and European markets ended lower.

In currency trading, the dollar gained versus the euro and fell against the yen. 

Source

07/01/2009 (3:33 am)

Meet Buffett’s $2.1 million lunch partner

Filed under: management |

Plunking down $2.11 million for a steak lunch might seem a tad bit excessive, even to a successful hedge fund manager.

But for Zhao Danyang it was a small price to pay to dine with Warren Buffett, the man whose strategy Zhao studied to make sense of the investing world.

The manager of Hong Kong-based Pure Heart Asset Management won the lunch date in an annual online charity auction a year ago. The money goes toward the Glide Foundation, an organization that fights poverty and homelessness in the San Francisco area.

The three-hour meal of steak and seafood at Manhattan’s Smith & Wollensky steakhouse, which picked up the tab, puts Zhao in the same company as the likes of David Einhorn of hedge fund Greenlight Capital. Einhorn won the lunch for a bargain $250,100 in 2003.

Buffett joined Zhao and seven of his friends and family members, but the Oracle of Omaha wasn’t the only savvy investor at the table. Zhao says his fund has had a 600% return over six years. Even Buffett had to be impressed.

But Zhao, 37, pointed to the iconic investor as the influence behind his strategy: "Over the last few years I made money," he told Fortune the day after the lunch, "I contribute my success to Warren."

A decade ago Zhao owned a small consumer-electronics company in China and had some money in the stock market. But when the Asian financial markets collapsed in the late 1990s, Zhao lost a significant amount of money.

"I was very angry with myself," he says. "I said to myself, I’m never going to buy stock anymore."

That all changed after he read a book that outlined Buffett’s investment strategy. It made him understand stocks in a way he never had before, Zhao says, and he became committed to the idea of value investing. In 2000 he got back into the market and soon launched his own hedge fund.

This was not the first time Zhao had seen Buffett in person. The CEO of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) invited him out to his annual shareholders meeting in May in Omaha. But this time around he actually had the chance to pick his brain.

"He’s so famous, but he’s just like your friend," Zhao said guaranteed online personal loans.

Buffett has been closed-mouthed about the lunchtime conversation. "That guy just paid $2 million [for] my advice," Buffett told the New York Daily News. "I’m not going to give it to you for free."

Zhao recounted that he and Buffett did not talk about the short-term outlook, saying that as long-term investors it’s irrelevant to them. But they did discuss economic cycles, a concept Zhao said was relatively new to him and to China.

They talked too about Buffett’s philanthropic work. Zhao wanted to know why Buffett gave his money to the Gates Foundation instead of starting an organization of his own. Buffett told him that for the same reason people gave Buffett their money to invest because they believed he could allocate capital effectively, the billionaire gave his money to Gates because Buffett thinks Gates can do the same thing in the philanthropic world.

Zhao’s 5-year-old son also was at the lunch, and Buffett told him he was fortunate to be born in China today. Both the U.S. and China will do well in the next 20 years, he said, but China will grow more quickly and provide serious opportunities.

"He said if he had a choice, he would like to be my son, lucky just like when he grew up in the U.S.," Zhao said.

Zhao was in the U.S. for 10 days on business in addition to the lunch, but in between his full schedule he managed to put down an offer on a New York City apartment. He’s also thinking about opening up an office in the U.S. down the road.

"I want to live here and study everything here to learn more about America," he says. "[The U.S.] will do well in the future so it’s a good time to invest now."

The bidding for next year’s lunch runs through today. But not just anyone can join Buffett for a steak. All bidders must pre-qualify and have at least $25,000 lying around for the opening bid. Hours before the close, the bidding had reached $350,000. 

Source

Next Page »